„Road traffic rules apply — so I'm insured."
On a closed racetrack, the conditions of the organiser and the insurers apply, not the logic of public road traffic. Registration ≠ cover.

What most drivers believe — and why it can become expensive.
Anyone who drives onto the track should have understood these three statements. Not skimmed. Understood.
It pays third-party damage so the injured party is not left empty-handed. It is not a shield for the person who caused the loss. What many take to be their own protection is the protection of someone else.
Most policy conditions explicitly exclude driving on permanent racetracks. Whether trackday, free practice or Touristenfahrten — the damage to your own car stays with you.
A signed waiver governs the relationship between drivers. It does not prevent an insurer from taking recourse against you after paying third-party damage.
„Road traffic rules apply — so I'm insured."
On a closed racetrack, the conditions of the organiser and the insurers apply, not the logic of public road traffic. Registration ≠ cover.
„My risk is at most €5,000."
That is the deductible at best. For own damage, excluded comprehensive cases or recourse, the figure is the full replacement or repair value.
„As long as it isn't a race, everything is fine."
The exclusion is not tied to the word 'race', but to driving on permanent racetracks or at motorsport events. The term is broad.
„My car is registered, so it is insured."
Registration says nothing about cover at a specific location. The policy decides — and most exclude precisely where the risk is highest.
„The organiser takes care of it."
The organiser handles the schedule, the track release and possibly a waiver of liability between participants. They are not your insurer and do not absorb damage.
Each of these myths sounds reasonable. That is exactly why they persist.
There are eight more — and they cost the most when taken to be true.
Read all misconceptions →In the external relationship, the insurer is liable towards the injured party. It must pay so that the victim is not left in the cold — regardless of whether you yourself are entitled to cover. In the internal relationship between you and your insurer a different logic applies: your contract, your exclusions, your obligations.
There is a statutory mechanism that protects the injured party even when the policy of the person causing the damage provides no cover for that exact situation. The insurer pays externally — it must. This is consumer protection, not driver protection.
Once the insurer has paid externally, even though the contract internally provided no cover, it recovers the money where it belongs: from you. What looked like „the insurer settled it" turns into a six-figure claim months later. This is not a bug. This is the system.
Many of these assumptions stem from typical misconceptions about insurance on the racetrack.
Why the new EU law changes nothing in this situation is set out in the briefing on § 5d PflVG.
How liability insurance, comprehensive cover and recourse actually interact is explained in how racetrack insurance works.
Most assumptions about insurance hold up exactly until the moment something happens.
Then it becomes visible how liability, comprehensive cover and recourse actually operate.
Not an extreme case — typical constellations.
What circulates in the paddock, in forums and in marketing claims — and what of it actually withstands legal scrutiny.
Many believe § 5d PflVG makes motorsport liability insurance mandatory. The opposite is correct.
Statements circulate in the market that do not hold up legally.
Liability insurance, comprehensive cover and recourse work differently than most assume.
BetterCallCris is not a broker.
BetterCallCris does not sell insurance.
Legal clarity where the risk becomes real: racetrack, trackday, Touristenfahrten.
Read contracts. Compare conditions. Assess recourse risk. No estimates.
Drivers of high-value cars, organisers, instructors — people who need to know what they are signing up for.
This briefing does not replace individual legal advice. It is meant to make sure you ask the right questions — before you leave the pit lane for the first time.
Motor third-party liability insurance may be required to pay, but it primarily protects the injured party. The driver often has no comprehensive protection. The insurer can later reclaim what it paid by way of recourse.
Most comprehensive policies expressly exclude driving on racetracks. This applies regardless of whether it is a race or a trackday. Damage to one's own vehicle therefore generally remains with the driver.
No. Neither the new EU liability law nor § 5d PflVG creates an obligation to take out a motorsport liability policy. The provision concerns only the protection of injured third parties.
The financial risk is often higher than assumed. Because comprehensive cover is usually excluded and liability cover is only partially effective, losses can quickly reach the full vehicle value.
In principle, the person who caused the accident is liable under civil law. Insurers may pay to a limited extent, but often take recourse. Damage to one's own vehicle is often not insured.
No. A waiver only governs claims between participants. It does not prevent damage and does not replace insurance cover.
No. Registration says nothing about insurance cover. What matters is solely what is set out in the insurance contract.
If you drive on the racetrack,
you should understand the system.